Today a Florida jury decided to not execute a kid who shot up a school. It didn’t take long for the jurors to decide since three jurors were ethically opposed to killing anyone. Some jurors believe the three lied when they swore they were unbiased. Some others may not have liked the idea but mass killing of kids was the ethical line for them. The ethical dilemma is would those against an execution feel the same if he had killed their child.
During World War II someone made the decision to not bomb the railroad tracks leading to the extermination camps. Why we don’t know and may never know who made that ethical decision. Today we are training Ukrainians to use the high tech equipment we are sending to them for use against the Russian invaders. Putin has repeatedly said he will use tactical nuclear weapons to stop his army’s defeats. How will we respond? Will we give the Ukraine nuclear weapons to respond, will we respond through NATO, or will be do nothing again.
The ethical question each American is asked to make today is here in the United States. Since Roe v. Wade was overturned after 50 years, each voter is being asked to decide how they stand by who they vote for. Many of those running have been adamantly against it in the Primary but are lessening for the general election to get votes. Some have changed their position weekly. Illinois’ GOP Governor Nominee said he “is against it for right now.” Inconsistent ethics is based on getting elected for most.
We are all faced with ethical decisions and one is whether to give those who disagree with us the opportunity to present their view and perhaps to compromise on an issue both can live with.