I keep hearing people say the first amendment says they don’t have to wear a mask if they don’t want to do so. The Morris Menards has a sixteen square foot sign in front of its store making it very clear if the shopper doesn’t wear a mask they can’t come in. They have a person stationed by the gates to make sure.

Using the same argument, restaurants post “no shoes, no shirt, no service” signs which people have obeyed for years. Surely, seeing some big hairy chest while eating is less important than the possibility of getting and spreading a killer virus to others.

A person’s right to do something that isn’t banned by law ends the moment their right interferes with another person’s right. To think otherwise is just stupid. If a person doesn’t want to wear a mask in their vehicle, in the parking lot, in their house and yard, or in the middle of a field, that’s fine. If they like to walk or run on the street, sidewalk, or trail and are likely to encounter another person they should wear a mask or practice social distancing. They should wear a mask in apartment halls.

It is a person’s civic duty to keep from spreading a deadly virus or even a regular cold. It is selfish, inconsiderate, and un-American to aid in catching and then spreading the virus. I wonder when the law enforcement people will connect a person spreading the virus to another person who dies from it and calls it a felony!

Oh, Tom Hanks and his wife caught it in February and they keep getting their anti-bodies amount tested. They are declining rapidly which may mean they can soon get it again. Tom was on TV advocating the wearing of masks.

To buy or not to buy, that is the question. Is it better for a state to buy emergency medical equipment by bidding against other states or for the Federal Government to purchase them at a lower price? The obvious answer is for the Federal Government to maintain price control by being sole buyer and having used Presidential powers to create new manufacturers.

As a news junkie I watch Trump as much as I can tolerate. I have heard him say he would use the Government’s reserves to give to the states and buy more when needed. They should not complicate things by trying to buy supplies themselves. Then a few weeks later he says it is the states’ responsibility and not his. Then later, he says the states are running up the cost by bidding against each other and he will buy for them.

Then his president-in-waiting son-in-law says the Federal Reserve is for the federal governments use only. That is why the Illinois treasurer had to pay 3.5 million for items at a Dwight McDonalds which would have been much less if FEMA had been buying all the supplies. Other states weren’t willing to pay that much.

How can people think President Trump is doing a good job when he constantly is shown to be mismanaging the effort and contradicting his own expert team? He pushes an unproven drug because Rudy Giuliani tells him it will stop the virus. The question I want to know – is Giuliani lobbying for the drug company and how does Trump benefit from selling it?

Is the Federal Government supposed to buy and distribute fairly or create total confusion?